NOTES ON EGYPTIAN RELIGION AND
According to the accepted view, civilisations are made possible by settled agriculture producing food for more people than those necessary to work the land, thus promoting the division of labour and the establishment of heirarchies. The fact that Egypt was relatively isolated from other early civilisations in the Middle East, coupled with what appears as a conscious rejection of foreign culture, meant that the energies created by surpluses were turned inwards. The extent of Egypt's debt to Sumer is difficult to assess (although as regards architectural style in the early dynasties it is clear enough) but differences are more marked than similarities. Egypt quickly became a single state governed by a god-king, but Sumer comprised a competing mass of city states administered by priests 'deputising' for the gods - the mythologies are distinct and it is difficult to see Egypt merely as a sort of Sumerian colony. Also the computational methods of Egypt were different from those of Sumer (although the length of the year and the 'hours of the night' in Egypt were sexaguesimal as they were in the Mesopotamia). Certain Egyptian traits find similarities in African tribal customs.
There are further, but more disturbing, parallels with other ancient cultures : in the Second dynasty there is evidence of the burial of retainers with their lord - as was the case in Ur of the Chaldees, An Yang in China, and elsewhere. Whether the victims were willing sacrifices we have no way of knowing for it is difficult to understand the feelings and actions of persons conditioned by a mythic outlook so different from our own, but the practice speaks of superstition or despotism.
The elite that governed Egypt shrewdly linked their power to that controlling the flood on which the life of Egypt depended, aided by a complex but all-encompassing mythology that made heaven a copy of life on earth.Reisner comments : 'The spirit lived as a member of a familiar community not as an isolated soul dwelling in darkness and amongst strangers'.
It was nevertheless an elite that had attained its position through the exercise of power (that, at the end of the Old Kingdom, was to collapse into chaos). Early Egypt may not have engaged in war so readily as its neighbours but its existence, like theirs, depended upon this power. In Egypt a male god gave birth to the world, in stark contradiction to all natural process, and his progeny on earth, pharaoh, assumed responsibility for the prosperity of the state - on the famous pre-dynastic 'Narmer palette' he is shown holding a hoe. He was the central figure in the birth ritual - the counterpart of the death ritual - in his 'Hebsed' festival, or 'renewing jubilee', a procession was led by a man holding aloft the pharaoh's placenta mounted upon a pole - perhaps the prototype of all flags. As one writer says of pharaoh (1) 'The elites were symbols of collective sentiment, not raw power. Kings, popes, flags, parents, and Santa Claus all rolled into one'.
Egyptians claimed that their civilisation had been founded by divine ancestors. The beginning of the historical period was commemorated as the 'unification of the two lands' and repeatedly depicted in the iconography of all later periods : Egypt was conceived as being divided into two parts - the delta, 'lower Egypt', symbolised by WADJIT the cobra; and the Nile valley extending to the tropic, 'upper Egypt', symbolised by NEKHBET the vulture. The heads of these two animals surmounted the double crown of pharaoh and represented his dominion over the united territory of Egypt.
The modern tendency has been to consider that Egyptian civilisation was a natural development of long-existing pre-dynastic groups - upper Egypt first reached 'critical mass' and then subdued the people of the delta and other neighbours. The major pre-dynastic centres appear to have been located in the south, chiefly in the area near Hierakonpolis, although of course we have little knowledge of conditions in the north, subsequently obliterated by the building of the delta, nor the extent of foreign contact which most likely would have occurred in this area. That there was such contact is however proven by the existence of Mesopotamian artefacts, cylinder seals and the like, which have turned up in pre-dynastic deposits. With the establishment of the Egyptian state these traits all but disappear and, in remains from the First dynasty, we are presented with all the essential features of the Egyptian style - a running hieroglyphic script, furniture, jewellery, the practice of mummification and burial in extended position - all to be found in the classic tomb.
How Egypt was unified remains largely a matter of guesswork based largely on certain associations represented in the pictorial art of the period. This lack of evidence is in part due to the fact that Egyptian history was not smooth but punctuated by two 'intermediate-periods' when society broke down. Climatic change and fluctuations in the Nile inundations may have created the conditions for the first of these. At any rate Petrie found that at Giza statuary had been reduced to fragments in what appears a frenzy of hatred, but such uprisings are not recorded in state propaganda. Pyramids supposedly were built for eternity but five hundred years after Khufu his temple was stripped of reliefs and blocks reused. The few extant records, such as lists of kings, appear as if manipulated for political or symbolic ends. There is little trace of an alternative voice, save for fragments of satirical graffiti.
In the late pre-dynastic period the archaeological record suggests a rapid period of development towards the classic style - for example 'proto-hieroglyphs' and the beginnings of the register system in artistic representation. (So rapid that earlier excavators (2) tended to the view that a superior culture had entered Egypt from the 'outside'). It appears that the local traditions of the numerous small states and tribes inhabiting the country were incorporated into a unified system of belief. A 'totem' is a class of natural objects to which members of a clan consider themselves related (the idea remains with us today when we adopt as political emblems lions, eagles, and suchlike, the relics of armorial bearings) and the Egyptians managed to incorporate the totems of each tribe and district into a complex yet harmonious whole. HORUS the hawk, THOTH the ibis, ANUBIS the jackal - these were just some of the gods certain of whose attributes and associations were derived from pre-dynastic times.
Egyptians believed in the existence of 'spiritual bodies' and indulged in magical practices which are described in New Kingdom papyri. 'Letters to dead' were written by pious supplicants. The deceased relied upon 'tomb-equipment' - offerings and models of workers - to provide him with sustenance in the after-life. Heiroglyphic signs were 'erased' or part-completed apparently in order to destroy their magic power. All this smacks of simple superstition. On the other hand it is clear that we are dealing with a pragmatic state religion in which the social function was paramount, and whose structure, myths, tenets, and rituals acted to impress upon the citizen that he lived in an environment self-evidently ordained by the gods.
The Egyptians acknowledged a wide and somewhat perplexing array of gods (or, perhaps better, 'divine principles'), many appearing to derive from the totems of pre-dynastic tribes. These gods were the principal actors in a series of complex and sometimes contradictory myths. Each myth was associated with a particular cult centre - the principal ones being at Heliopolis and Memphis at the division of the two lands, and at Hermopolis and Thebes in upper Egypt. Confusion arises because the cosmogonies taught at each centre appear to us to be contradictory, and involved a different selection of gods. Some only rose to pre-eminence in later periods - as with the cult of AMUN at Thebes, while other gods act out their part in more than one myth - as with THOTH, god of science and learning, whose chief cult centre was located at Hermopolis, home of the ancient myth of the Ogdoad. The chief god of Memphis was PTAH, from whom our name for the country is derived. The myth of Heliopolis, telling the story of ISIS and OSIRIS, developed during the pyramid age.Gods of the early Old Kingdom
In the myth of Heliopolis ATUM was considered the father of the gods. The Heliopolitan group called the 'ENNEAD' comprised 9 gods - 5 'divine' and 4 'semi-human' - and their origins were as follows :
ATUM (m), self-arising from the primaeval waters of chaos (NUN), by masturbation created the first pair - SHU (m) 'air' and TEFNUT (f) 'moisture'. These in turn begat GEB (m) 'earth' and NUT (f) 'sky'.
Geb attempted to mate with his sister and so their parents 'came between them', and in the iconography Shu is shown with arms raised holding up the heavenly vault of Nut while Geb lays recumbent. In spite of this, Geb and Nut managed to beget OSIRIS (m) and ISIS (f), and SET (m) and NEPTHYS (f) - brothers and sisters and wives and husbands - 'semi-human' members of the Ennead, with Set being portrayed with the head of a strange beast.
Accounts of succeeding events are fragmentary and sometimes contradictory but it is generally agreed that Set became jealous of his brother Osiris and killed him, and ultimately succeeded in dismembering his body and distributing its parts throughout Egypt. Isis then collected these parts together (thus making the prototype mummy) and brought Osiris back to life to reign as lord of the 'DUAT' - the mysterious netherworld of the dead.
In the continuation of the myth, the resurrection of Osiris enables Isis to conceive HORUS (m) the well-known falcon-headed god (yet distinct from the 'elder Horus'), who is often depicted as protecting the earthly pharaohs. Horus fights against Set and succeeds in reclaiming his rightful inheritance. But the balance between the two gods, often portrayed as 'the uniting of the two lands', is a dynamic one - Set represents forces of disorder which must continually be resisted through the collective efforts of mankind, organised, for this purpose, into an ideal state headed by pharaoh the living 'son of Re'.
(The role of Set in early dynasties is unclear - one IInd dynasty pharaoh even appears to have made Set pre-eminent. Set as a symbol of disorder must be distinguished from the primaeval chaos from which Atum emerged through his own will. : in later scenarios Set is even allocated a place in the barque of Re. De Lubicz suggested that Set's 'asses ears' are clipped so that, like the fallen angel Satan, he is deaf to order and wisdom).
The supreme importance of the Ennead and Horus in the New Kingdom is demonstrated by their allocation to the first ten divisions of the Royal cubit rule - an important measure of length throughout dynastic Egypt and which was particularly employed in royal monuments. The Ennead is present in the earliest-known inscriptions found inside small pyramids of the fifth and sixth dynasties : the Pyramid Texts. In the Middle Kingdom the material in these texts was written on coffins, and in the New Kingdom was elaborated to form the famous 'Book of the Dead'- a collection of invocations on papyrus to be read at funeral ceremonies and then buried with the deceased.
The essential part of the Book of the Dead was the 'negative confession' - the reading over the mummy of the deceased of a long, formulated list of moral transgressions that he had resisted during his lifetime. Then, with his relatives re-enacting the parts of mythic protagonists, he was imagined to undergo the ceremony called the 'weighing of the heart' : in which his heart was tested in the balance against the feather of truth. If he failed in this test he would be devoured by a fearsome beast and utterly destroyed. But if his heart was true he would be led into the presence of Osiris - his son as Horus 'opening the mouth' of the mummy and causing it to enter the world of the Duat.
The broad tenets of Heliopolitan belief might not appear greatly different from some of today's monotheist beliefs - a male god procreating without woman; judgement; life after death; and the idea that humanity has been created to do god's work. But in Egypt 'god and caesar' were one : pharaoh, the 'living Horus', represented the focus of contact with the divine for the whole population. Egyptian history was the acting out of ritual, and each succeeding king stood at the beginning of mythological time, overcoming chaos, and causing Egypt to come into being. A continuous effort had to be made against the forces of chaos (one might say against entropy). The king was the mediator between gods and men and his essential duty was to maintain the cult rituals and Maat. His name was written in a 'loop in the thread of time' called a Cartouche -
In New Kingdom temple depictions of the birth of Horus, Amun-Re takes the form of a man to impregnate a woman chosen to give birth to the future king. Thoth appears to her (like an angel to Mary) to tell her she has the divine seed inside her and will give birth to the sun and creator. Consequently the king's mother and multiple wives (who were often sisters, in an attempt to keep the blood pure apparently) had very important positions at court. But evidence from the earliest dynasties does not lend much weight to such a scenario.
Tomb inscriptions suggest that the king's relations to the gods were redefined during the 5th dynasty. The semi-human members of the Ennead were co-opted from previous traditions by the priests of Heliopolis to construct a myth which would reinforce the divine rulership of the king. For example it was said that Thoth had gambled with the gods to win 5 extra days to the formal 360 day year, during which the five semi-human members of the Ennead could be born. Osiris replaced Khentamentiu and ANDJETI, the original anthropomorphic god of Abydos holding the crook and flail sceptres (emblems of animal husbandry and agriculture or, if you will, carrot and stick). The word 'Ennead', although meaning 'nine', seems to have been applied to different numbers of gods, and in the Pyramid Texts only one utterance has the 'canonical' list.
Whatever the facts of its origins, the 'passion of
Osiris' appealed to the people :
Fundamental to the Egyptian concept of order was the rhythm of the Nile. Each year the rains in Ethiopia caused the swelling of the river and this produced an annual flood in Egypt, usually at the end of June. (It was hardly a strict rhythm - records from the New Kingdom show that the time between floodings could vary from 345 to 415 days).When the inundation had subsided, and deposited its fertile silt, the fields would be re-surveyed and planting begun. The flood occurred at about the time that Sirius or SOPDET, the brightest star in the sky, first appeared before dawn over the eastern horizon and traditionally this was taken to signal the inundation. In early dynasties depicted as a cow, Sopdet was later identified with Isis.
The backdrop to the mythological drama, as in many other cultures, was the sky. The sky goddess Nut is portrayed in tombs giving birth to her celestial progeny and along the 'Winding Waterway', conceived as a body of fresh water like the Nile, the gods travelled in their celestial boats to set in the west - the land of the dead. Krauss argues that the Waterway is the band of the ecliptic (4). (The sun of course was Re and, since the inner planets are always close to the sun, Krauss proposes that the conflict between Horus and Set is represented by conjunctions between Venus and Mercury. Bauval proposes that the Winding Waterway was the Milky Way). The netherworld, called the DUAT, was pictured as a star in a circle, probably signifying that part of the sky beneath the earth. Gods needed to transfer from the day boat to the night boat in their daily round and these boats were often represented by models or pits, as in the illustration below showing the boat pits beside Khafre's mortuary temple.
Stars were 'oarsmen' and those
near the ecliptic were
associated with the dead, while the 'imperishable' northern stars which
never set offered renewed life. The Book of the Dead tells us that the
aim of the deceased was to enter into the presence of Osiris, while the
Pyramid Texts make clear that the dwelling of this god was somewhere in
the prominent, man-like constellation Orion, just south of the
ecliptic. Orion was personified as SAH, who
according to the Pyramid Texts was the 'father of the gods'.
'O king, you who are this Great Star, the Companion of Orion, who traverses the sky with Orion, who navigates the Duat with Osiris; you ascend from the east of the sky, being renewed in your due season, and rejuvenated in your due time. The sky has born you with Orion.' (Pyramid Texts 882, 883).
The sarcophagus containing the mummy destined to be re-born as 'an Osiris' was associated with Nut - the first utterance of the Pyramid Texts, inscribed upon the sarcophagus, reads :
'Recitation by Nut, the great beneficent. The king is my eldest son who split open my womb; he is my beloved, with whom I am well pleased.' (Pyramid Texts 1).
In coffins of later periods the inner side of the lid presents a portrayal of Nut flanked on one side with Isis/Sirius and Osiris/Orion in their celestial boats (the southern constellations) and, on the other, a portrayal of the northern constellations. Similar portrayals have also been found on the ceilings and walls of certain New Kingdom tombs.
Throughout the pyramid age, the entrance passages of tombs and pyramids were aligned in the general direction of the celestial pole - the axis around which the heavens revolve, and the region of the sky which was given especial prominence in Egyptian astronomical representations. Also pyramids are laid out with precision to the cardinal points and it is generally agreed that to have achieved this the builders must have used astronomical methods, probably sighting on stars near the pole. (These stars were gods so the layout of pyramids was no pragmatic exercise but a sacred act). The precise identification of the stars in these northern constellations is the subject of some debate. The only constellation identified with certainty is the Great Bear - represented in New Kingdom times by the thigh of a bull. Sometimes portrayed are the 'Four Sons of Horus', to which four organs (lungs, stomach, liver, and intestines : ie. those involved in the processing of food) were dedicated and preserved seperately during mummification ceremonies. Perhaps most revealing is the portrayal of a pregnant Hippopotamus - TAWERET the goddess of child-birth.
The Egyptians believed in the existence of a number of spiritual bodies. The KA is variously translated as 'personality' 'individuality' 'self' and 'lifeforce' - after death offerings of food were made to it at a special place in the tomb. The BA is more difficult to fathom, for even objects had Ba's. Usually translated as 'soul' it was represented by the Ibis bird. (Another translation is 'manifestation' : the king's Ba could manifest in acts). In funerary rituals the body needed to be re-assembled as in the myth of Osiris, that is, made into a magical mummy or 'established from decay'. Apparently only then could the Ba 'wake up' the corpse and, after this, the Ka and Ba 'combined' to make the AKH or 'radiant light' or 'resurrection body' (represented as the crested Ibis). This then ascended to Nut to become a star and accompany Re in his boat of 'millions of years'. The place just below the eastern horizon where heavenly bodies are born was called the AKHET. Hence the 'horizon' of Khufu is the place where Khufu was transformed into an Akh.
In the Old Kingdom the king was considered as embodying the Ka's of his subjects so his rebirth would ensure that of all, and the pyramid was the magical icon which would effect this. Among other things, the pyramid appears to represent the mound of Atum arising from the waters of chaos (an idea perhaps reinforced by Butler's sea level finding). In later times, the pyramid was identified with Osiris :
'O Horus, this King is Osiris, this pyramid of the King is Osiris, this construction of his is Osiris; betake yourself to it, do not be far from it in its name of Pyramid.' (Pyramid texts 1657).
This 'Osiris pyramid' enabled the dead king to unite with Re the sun god, while kingship was transferred to his son 'the living Horus'. Thereafter the pyramid was 'maintained' by a body of priests. Pyramid building thus represented a sort of contract between the living and the dead, with obligations on both sides.
Although each pyramid is unique, with often quite complex passage arrangements, all are broadly similar : an entrance in the north face opening to a passage directed towards the polar region, and ultimately terminating in a sarcophagus chamber. Often this is preceded by an 'ante-chamber'. By studying the Pyramid texts, Allen (5) was able to throw some light on the meaning of this layout. He proposes that the texts were meant for the king and the direction in which they are written leads him out of the pyramid to be reborn. The sarcophagus chamber is the Duat. The sarcophagus, usually in the west of the chamber, is Nut the mother of Osiris. When the king's Ba awakes and leaves the mummy in the Duat, it moves from west to east - that is, the direction in which the sun moves beneath the earth to be reborn at the eastern horizon. The ante-chamber is the Akhet where the king becomes an Akh. The passage in the north wall leads out to the polar region and ultimately the king is reborn on the eastern horizon. From this it is reasonable to suppose that the Egyptians saw the pole as 'the navel of the sky' and the image of the goddess of childbirth located there supports this. But how did the Akh king appear at the eastern horizon?
The idea that the narrow-section shafts leading upwards from the King's and Queen's chambers inside the pyramid of Khufu are 'airshafts' seems to have originated when the former were first cleaned out and found to introduce fresh air into the chamber.Pyramidologists took up the idea, believing that the King's chamber contained a standard of measure which needed to be kept at a constant temperature. I do not know who first suggested that the shafts were constructed to supply fresh air to workers, or those attending upon a burial, but this unlikely idea has been widely accepted until very recently.
Some Egyptologists propose a 'cultic' meaning whereby, for example, the shafts allowed something akin to a 'soul' to leave or enter the tomb. It is well known from texts, tomb decorations, and coffin lids, that Egyptian gods had a celestial aspect. Most pyramids have 'polar' entrance passages, so-called because they point towards the circumpolar stars (or, according to the ancient Egyptians, the 'imperishables' - the stars that never set). This proposition appears to be generally accepted even though polar passage angles vary and no specific stellar target has been identified. But evidence suggests passage angles were determined primarily using geometry and proportion
idea that Khufu's shafts were directed to stellar targets seems to have
been rejected because the suggested alignments are not absolutely
precise. The probable targets of the king's chamber
shafts were identified by Badawy and Trimble in 1964 (6) as Orion's
belt and Thuban. In
1993 Gantenbrink used robots to explore, so far as he was
permitted, not only these but the Queen's chamber shafts as
well. Using Gantenbrink's data, Bauval
identified the Queen's chamber shaft targets as Sirius, and Kochab in
Ursa Minor. He concluded that
four passages had been aimed at specific stars, making a pattern very
similar to the coffin lid illustrated above (7).
He noticed that the angle given by Gantenbrink for the north starshaft of the Queen's Chamber aligns tolerably well to the upper culmination of Kochab. At the moment of this event Orion's belt, that is to say the target of the King's chamber south shaft, was rising on the eastern horizon as shown in the illustration below. (At azimuth of approximately 108 degrees - the angle of the pentagon. This calls to mind the five-spoked hieroglyph for a star and the 'DUAT' - Al Nitak rose at 108 degrees in 2650 BC, when construction of large pyramids was beginning).
In fact three stars were in alignment with the pole and meridian : the Great and Little Bears were in alignment on opposite sides of the pole and when this alignment reached the meridian - Orion was born. Looking north -
He also noted that the constellations of the Great and Little Bears resembled the 'adzes' used in portrayals of the ceremony of the 'Opening of the Mouth', performed on the mummy of the dead king to give it life (and by the way also performed to 'give life' to statues, a practice found also in Mesopotamia).
The name of the ceremony itself suggests a metaphor derived from the common experience of Midwives - the need to clear the air passages of the newly born so that it can breathe and receive sustenance (6)). The Great Bear (the Egyptian constellation of the 'Thigh') was associated with the Four Sons of Horus and the cardinal points, and seems in some way to have generated the force that turned the sky. (In the illustration above the figure of 'Wepwawet' the jackal, 'Opener of the Ways' has been included). It appeared that the Egyptians had devised a myth, enacted in the heavens yet paralleled in common human experience. Even the symbolic flint implements used for cutting the foetal chord have been found at Giza, marked with the name of Khufu.
believed he could extract a corrected date for Giza based on the mean
angles of the shafts of 2450 BC. Unfortunately it does not work.
The mean angles of the shafts in degrees were given by Gantenbrink as follows :
KC north 32.6
KC south 45
QC north 39.1*
QC south 39.6
The target stars at these elevations give dates as follows :
KC north Thuban 2330 BC
KC south Alnitak 2500
QC north Kochab 2350
QC south Sirius 2380
The mean of these dates is not 2450 BC. Bauval suggested that the discrepancy can be explained as building error.
However, the shafts are not straight but made up of straight sections, and numerous bends near the chambers, so it is obvious that the builders had no interest in maintaining unbroken 'lines of sight' to their stellar targets. Tedder noted that the final section of KC north is built with a slope of 31.2 degrees, and this was the altitude of Thuban in 2570 BC - within the accepted dates for Khufu. (At this date Alnilam, the middle star of the belt, fits KC the south shaft alignment more precisely than Alnitak). Thuban was the pole star during the pyramid age.
The alignment of the QC shafts is more problematic, the dates given by measured shaft angles give dates that are too young for the supposed star culminations. Even so, to find the southern shafts of Khufu aligned, if only notionally, towards the two important stellar targets, Sirius and Orion, remains compelling. But there is no evidence
pointing to an association with Sirius and Osiris during Khufu's time. 150
years later these associations seem to be in place. Yet the
architecture of Khufu's and 5th dynasty pyramids remains essentially
the same, and one would expect the 'function' of their architectural
features, and the rituals that are known to have taken place, to be
similar also. If Khufu was not mummified as an 'Osiris' (so without the
fratricide and ensuing pathos) was it enough to become an 'Akh'? While
Isis and Osiris are mentioned in the Pyramid Texts they are hardly
major stars in the pantheon of gods addressed (or threatened if the
king be barred from joining Re!). Is the first humble appearance here
Isis and Osiris representative of a growing 'saviour' sect within the
'church' which nevertheless had to be included in the list of spells
to be on the safe side'?
A note on the Stellar Correlation Theory
As a result of its extensive
promotion most readers will be familiar with Bauval's proposal that the
three Giza pyramids were laid out in the pattern of stars of Orion's
belt. Since the south shaft of the King's chamber points to this
asterism the idea cannot be lightly dismissed,
but on closer examination there are many problems.
In the development of this theory Bauval suggested that the remaining IVth dynasty pyramids also corresponded to stars - the unfinished pyramids at Zawiyet El Aryan and Abu Rawash representing two other stars of the Orion configuration, Bellatrix and Saiph, while the Dashur pyramids represented two stars of the Hyades cluster in the constellation Taurus. However, while the northern 'red' pyramid of Dashur might correlate with the bright orange star Aldebaran, for the southern 'bent' pyramid there is no bright star candidate, so why was this pyramid built equal in size to its northern neighbour? Similar objections apply to further attempts to correlate stars with pyramids. The pyramids of the Vth and VIth dynasties contain the very Pyramid Texts that speak of a stellar destiny yet the positions of these small pyramids cannot be correlated with stars on a one-to-one basis. Therefore, if the theory is true, these pyramids can only have represented stars near Orion in a general sense, their dimensioning and locations being determined by other factors According to this view Giza might represent 'an essential prototype' : the 'magnum opus' of Old Kingdom funerary monuments.
In the further development of his ideas Bauval claimed that the layout of the Giza pyramids, along an azimuth 45 degrees from north, reproduced the pattern of the belt stars as they lay on the meridian in 10450 BC at the lowest point of their precessional cycle. New evidence appeared to show that the Sphinx was extremely ancient and the suggestion was made that the whole site may have been laid out at this early date. Speculation arose that Giza had been designed by god-like beings from fabled Atlantis. A claim was even made that there were also pyramids and a 'sphinx-like' face on the planet Mars. Exciting stuff but unlikely.
That the Egyptians had copied the belt stars seemed not unreasonable - the correspondence between the positions of stars and pyramids was quite good and the small discrepancies in position could be ascribed to the need for the layout to conform to geometric constraints. But what of the orientation of the three pyramid centres? This might be expected to reproduce the configuration of the belt as it lay on the meridian in 2450 BC (the revised date for Khufu put forward by Bauval (7)) yet it did not.
As we have seen, the Giza group is laid out along a 45 degree diagonal. The layout position for the belt is achieved when the star Saiph, in the 'left leg' of Orion/Osiris, lies vertically below the star Al Nitak. As may be seen from these comparison pictures of Alnitak on the meridian, this was not case in 10450 BC -
But did the layout orientation need to match the position of the belt on the meridian? As the constellation of Orion moves across the sky from horizon to horizon its orientation changes, and at a certain moment the belt will appear in the layout position. I found that in 2450 BC (the revised date given by Bauval for Giza) this moment was defined when Thuban reached the meridian at its lower culmination. This star, at its upper culmination, was the target of the King's chamber north starshaft and at this date had a right ascension of 12 hours and at this moment the altitude of Al Nitak was about 37 degrees, while its azimuth was 37 degrees east of south -
At the estimated date of 2570 BC
for Khufu this relation is lost, yet the idea that the builders had
copied an image of the belt as it hung over the south eastern horizon
compelling. The concept of vertical star pairings appeared already to
have been exploited in the planning of the north shafts of
Recently Tedder has taken up the idea. He points out that a number of pyramid sites (or the edge of the western escarpment in the Memphite zone) fall on the 37 degree alignment as shown below (south is up on this diagram). Note that the Dashur pyramids do not fit in this scheme -
The Global Context
Lethaby remarked : 'The common places of poetry, in which the world is likened to a building, 'heavenly vaults', or 'azure domes', 'gates of sunrise', and the rest, are survivals of a time when the earth was not a tiny ball, projected at infinite speed through immeasurable space, one, among other fireflies of the night, but was stable and immoveable, the centre of the universe, the floor on which the sky was built. The whole, a chamber lighted by the sun, moon, and stars'. (10). He proposed that temples were built in the likeness of this world - their foundation a sacred ceremony and their relation to the heavens defined by observation. In recent decades research by archaeoastronomers has revealed that ancient sites worldwide were laid out with reference to heavenly bodies. In most cases these involve horizon alignments to the sun and moon at the extreme points of their cycles. For instance the Ka'ba in Mecca is oriented in such a way.
Many cultures have seen their mythologies enacted in the heavens (and the gods of ancient Greece are still with us as planets and the zodiac) although, of course, the figures they saw in the patterns of the stars sometimes differed greatly. The diagram below shows the system devised by a contemporary Amazon tribe (11) : the ideal distribution of of a phatry of three intermarrying Colombian tribes is considered as a hexagon. Tribal territory is bounded by 6 waterfalls and these are imagined to have stellar counterparts, and tribal longhouses are built according to the same model. The equator, marked by two other major waterfalls, passes through the centre of the hexagon. Its heavenly counterpart is imagined to be an alignment from Sirius through Orion's belt to Aldebaran, and then on to the Pleiades (this corresponding to the path from marriage to death). Men and women each have their own 'quest' - in the centre of the figure is shown the overlapping male/female dance pattern (copying the pattern of stars in Orion) and the vertical axis leads from a central rock covered with petroglyphs to Al Nilam - the central star in Orion's belt.
Given the clear desert air of Egypt and the sophisticated wealth of its civilization one might expect that 'heaven had been brought down to earth', and to find astronomical alignments in sacred buildings. Indeed, 100 years ago Lockyer wrote a book on the subject (12). Unfortunately he was an outsider, an Astronomer, and the Egyptologists of the day 'advised the cobbler to stick to his last'. Perhaps in a decade or two sufficient studies will have been made to make a proper assessment of Egyptian Astronomy. Meanwhile it is impossible to make any definite statement. RJC. 2002. (Note 2017. Work has been in progress at a number of temples and will be described in a future update).
1. Hoffman, M.A. 1980. Egypt before the Pharaohs. London.
2. Emery, W.B. 1961. Archaic Egypt. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
3. Malek, J. In the shadow of the pyramids.
4. Krauss, R. 1997. Astronomische Konzepte und Jenseitsvorstellungen in den Pyramidentexten. Wiesbaden.
5. Allen, J.P. 1988. Funerary texts and their meaning. in D'Auria, P. Lacovara and C.H. Roehrig (eds.). 'Mummies and Magic : The Funerary Arts of Ancient Egypt'. Boston.
5. Bauval, R.G. and A. Gilbert. 1994.The Adze of Upuat : The Opening of the Mouth Ceremony and the Northern Shafts in Cheops' Pyramid. Discussions in Egyptology.
6. Badawy, A. 1964. 'The Stellar Destiny of Pharaoh and the so-called Airshafts in Cheops' Pyramid'. and Trimble, V. 1964. 'Astronomical Investigations concerning the so-called Air-shafts of Cheops' Pyramid'. both in MIOAWB. Band.10.
7. Bauval, R.G. 1993. 'Cheops' Pyramid : A New Dating using the latest Astronomical Data'. Discussions in Egyptology. 26.
8. Roth, A.M. 1993. 'Fingers, Stars, and the "Opening of the Mouth" : the nature and function of the NTRWJ - blades'. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. Vol. 79. London. Roth notes that the ceremony of 'Opening the Mouth' of statues has parallels in early Mesopotamian civilisation.
9. Bauval, R.G. 1993. 'Cheops' Pyramid : A new Dating using the Latest Astronomical Data'. Discussions in Egyptology.. 26. This dating was supported by Spence but has since been thrown into serious doubt. The accepted date for the middle of Khufu's reign is around 2580 - 2570 BC.
10. Lethaby, W. 1891. 'Architecture, Mysticism and Myth'. Architectural Press, London. p.14.
11. Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. Astronomical Models of Behaviour among some Indians of Colombia'. New York Annals. 385.
12. Lockyer, J.N. 1894. The Dawn of Astronomy. London.
THE GEOMETRY OF KHUFU SHAFTS
In 1993 Gantenbrink set his famous robot to explore the shafts, so far as he was permitted, and announced his preliminary results. He found that the shafts are not perfectly straight and the average angles he gave were as follows :KC north 32.6
Legon proposed that the Queen's chamber shafts are symmetrical, each having a gradient of 17/14 -
Suggesting a plan like this -
Examing these shafts in more detail, it is seen that the northern shafts form a series of bends near to the chambers so as to avoid the Grand Gallery -
The south shaft of the King's Chamber varies near the chamber for no apparent reason. Nevertheless the south shaft is straight (or rather is made up of long straight sections) over much of its length, and the point of convergence of the two KC shafts would seem to have been planned in whole numbers of cubits -
In the case of the Queen's Chamber south shaft, the line of the shaft cuts the central axis 36 to 37 cubits above base. If the builder's had laid out this shaft according to Legon's proposal then it would need to intersect the central axis 35 to 36 cubits above base, in a similar configuration to the line of the northern shaft on the right -
Perhaps this is nitpicking but it is possible that an alternative
geometry was used -
From measurements of Gantenbrink's published diagrams, QC south has a sloping length of 121 cubits (from the centre of the pyramid to its termination by the famous 'door') for a vertical rise of 77 cubits - giving an angle of just over 39.5 degrees. (Measured angle is 39.6). The door is 114 cubits above base. Note that the angle proposed is that of the hypoteneuse of a near Pythagorean triangle with sides 363, 280, 231 - so that if a square is drawn on the height of the pyramid and divided by 3 the door is 93.3 cubits horizontally from centre. (A threefold division also determines the junction of ascending and descending passages, as shown to the right). revised May 08